To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.buildOpen lugnet.build in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / 5842
5841  |  5843
Subject: 
Re: Water Temple MOC
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build, lugnet.castle, lugnet.build.arch
Date: 
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 03:07:25 GMT
Viewed: 
3761 times
  
Hi Travis,

I did actually download and try out your new version of LDVIEW.
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to work well with my computer.  I have a
voodoo 2 3d card and a 450MHZ computer.  It selects software rendering
instead of the hardware accelleration.  Given that this is a fairly complex
model, my frame rate is about 1 frame a second!

Support for Voodoo 1&2 would be great, but I can understand the difficulty
if you don't have that sort of card.  Ironically, I bought a Voodoo because
it was most compatible with games at the time.

LDVIEW does look like a cool program.  I look forward to a new update with
more hardware support, or to a time when I can get some updated hardware.

Brad

Travis Cobbs <tcobbs@san.REMOVE.rr.com> wrote in message
news:G2M3ps.51n@lugnet.com...
> "Brad Hamilton" <bhamilto1@home.com> wrote in message
> news:G2LoCH.C5n@lugnet.com...
> > > > Nathan McDowell <Skiing_Scotsman@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > Wow!  I've never used LDraw but I can imagine that making something • that
> > big
> > > in that program without having something real to base it on was some • hefty
> > > piece of work to accomplish.  It looks great! =)
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks again.  I actually had to keep rendering it in POV-ray to get a
> > decent view of things.  MLCAD provides a 3-d view, but it is somewhat • rough.
> > The POV-ray output is great and it only takes a second or two to • generate
> at
> > reasonable quality.  MLCAD is a little difficult to learn, but its • pretty
> > efficient once you get the basics down.
> 
> I don't mean to blow my own horn (well, not too much anyway), but have you
> tried LDView?  It certainly doesn't produce visuals at the quality level • of
> L3P->POVRay, but I feel the quality is pretty good, especially since it's • a
> realtime viewer.  And, if you enable auto-update polling, it will reload
> every time you save your model in MLCAD.
> 
> Not having access to your DAT file, I'm not sure how fast it would be with
> this particular model, but I wouldn't expect it to be TOO slow (assuming • you
> have a video card with decent OpenGL support).
> 
> I just announced version 1.0 on .announce, .cad, and .cad.dev, but here is
> the URL:
> 
> http://home.san.rr.com/tcobbs/LDView/
> 
> --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@san.REMOVE.rr.com)
> 
> 
> 



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Water Temple MOC
 
"Brad Hamilton" <bhamilto1@home.com> wrote in message news:G2LoCH.C5n@lugnet.com... (...) hefty (...) rough. (...) at (...) I don't mean to blow my own horn (well, not too much anyway), but have you tried LDView? It certainly doesn't produce visuals (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.castle, lugnet.build.arch)

27 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR