 | | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
|
|
(...) I actually don't know. Does it? I've never read the books (I found that quote while looking for any page that actually listed true dimensions), and I don't believe I ever watched 2001. I remember watching 2010 when I was still pretty (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
|
|
[adding .geek] (...) It's been a while since I read these books, but doesn't their physical *size change*? (23 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
|
|
(...) (URL) Cheers, Matt "Make it so" (23 years ago, 25-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
|
|
<snip> (...) I am of the belief that you guys are nuts! :) (No offence intended) the simplest solution, as far as I can work out, is to build it for the most part studs up, and use some 2 stud long technic axles inside the inner tubes of the brick, (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO?
|
|
(...) ...which is the minimum size required to achieve the 1x4x9 dimensional ratio. I have been unable to find any evidence that the actual physical dimensions are known, beyond one person's claim that the physical Cinerama screen (which has an (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-04, to lugnet.build)
|
