 | | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | [adding .geek] (...) It's been a while since I read these books, but doesn't their physical *size change*? (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO? —David Laswell
|
| | | | | (...) I actually don't know. Does it? I've never read the books (I found that quote while looking for any page that actually listed true dimensions), and I don't believe I ever watched 2001. I remember watching 2010 when I was still pretty (...) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Wasn't the original monolith a pyramid in "The Sentinel of Eternity?" Did the short story specify its dimensions? Or was it a tetrahedron? I can't remember... Dave! (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO? —Mark Tarrabain
|
| | | | (...) Indeed it does, but the proportions always remain the same. >> Mark (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proportions for a 2001 Monolith in LEGO? —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) I meant to put the emphasis on just the word *size* there, to imply that. Ooops. :) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
