Subject:
|
Re: A Mid Summer's Study
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Aug 2002 22:20:53 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Adrian Egli <ADR.EGLI@WORLDNET.ATTnospam.NET>
|
Viewed:
|
301 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks for your complement.
I did consider using the 1x2 in the manner you mention. It would have been
easier to set down the bricks above (a 2x8 sitting above a single column of
1x1s 14 bricks high) and could easily been purchased through SAH. I suppose
what changed my mind from doing so was looking up close from a 3/4 angle
view. I should have put up a better picture but if you look at this one:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=232229
The 1x1 provide a thin element in contrast the bulk used to make the
quasi-arc, one of those aesthetic functions. I'm thinking of using 1x1x5
bricks to replace most of the 1x1x1 but it's the cost and numbers needed I'm
a bit shy of.
--
Adrian Egli
"M. Moolhuysen" <moom@nospam-chello.nl> wrote in message
news:H1GqA7.3GF@lugnet.com...
> That is a very pretty bridge, Adrian.
>
> If 1x1 bricks are a problem, I believe that bricks 1 x 2 would look quite
> nice also, when the're placed in such a way that one of their narrow sides
> is facing outwards.
>
> With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A Mid Summer's Study
|
| That is a very pretty bridge, Adrian. If 1x1 bricks are a problem, I believe that bricks 1 x 2 would look quite nice also, when the're placed in such a way that one of their narrow sides is facing outwards. With friendly greetings, M. Moolhuysen. (22 years ago, 26-Aug-02, to lugnet.build)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
