 | | Re: So what *IS* a Building Instruction anyway? —Steve Bliss
| | | | (...) Sure -- I'd say an accurate ldraw file is a very detailed document, specifying exactly what is in a model, and how it's put together. You can manually step through any model file; in MLCAD, change your settings to only display up to the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: So what *IS* a Building Instruction anyway? —Jacob Sparre Andersen
| | | | | [ XFUT lugnet.cad ] (...) Yes, but sometimes it is not exactly in an ideal form for the renderers we have at hand today. It would for example be practical, if it was possible: * to tell the renderer that something ought to be rendered as a (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: So what *IS* a Building Instruction anyway? —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Hmm. LDAO can do this. Or, it used to be able to. In the HTML instruction generator, it would scan for 0 SUB meta-statements in the main text. the 0 SUB line(s) would reference files that the HTML-IG would render as an inset subassembly. I (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: So what *IS* a Building Instruction anyway? —Jacob Sparre Andersen
| | | | | (...) If you get around to fixing it, then I would appreciate it, if you could seperate the code in operating system specific and non-operating system specific parts. Where is the syntax for the "SUB" meta-statements documented? Play well, Jacob (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | | |
