Subject:
|
Re: So what *IS* a Building Instruction anyway?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 18:36:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1844 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
> [ XFUT lugnet.cad ]
>
> Steve Bliss wrote:
> > Sure -- I'd say an accurate ldraw file is a very detailed document,
> > specifying exactly what is in a model, and how it's put together.
>
> Yes, but sometimes it is not exactly in an ideal form for
> the renderers we have at hand today. It would for example be
> practical, if it was possible:
>
> * to tell the renderer that something ought to be
> rendered as a sub-assembly.
Hmm. LDAO can do this. Or, it used to be able to. In the HTML instruction
generator, it would scan for 0 SUB meta-statements in the main text. the 0
SUB line(s) would reference files that the HTML-IG would render as an inset
subassembly. I think the HTML-IG has been broken for awhile now...
> * to tell the renderer to show different steps
> from different angles.
MLCAD can do this, but you haven't read about it...
Both operations you mention would be very nice things to be able to do, as a
native feature of the LDraw modelling-language (as opposed to the LDraw
parts-language, both of which would be variations of the general LDraw
graphical description language).
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: So what *IS* a Building Instruction anyway?
|
| (...) If you get around to fixing it, then I would appreciate it, if you could seperate the code in operating system specific and non-operating system specific parts. Where is the syntax for the "SUB" meta-statements documented? Play well, Jacob (24 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
