Subject:
|
Re: Circular airlock!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:41:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
89 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> That's magnificent! It reminds me of the "transporter" on my old
> Star Trek playset (wow, that was a LONG time ago--1977, I think)
> that worked on a similar principle. But I haven't thought about
> it since--that's an excellent employment of a rotating design.
Thanks Lindsay.
> Could you use the other "mating" arches--the roof ones--in such a
> design? That would make grey an easier proposition, because not
> many of us likely have the inverse arches in grey in large numbers.
You could, and that was my original idea, but then you couldn't use the 1x4
w/ studs on side, you'd have to use something that accepts studs (i.e. 2 1x2
technic bricks w/ two holes). And I couldn't find mine. :-( So yes, either
way works.
Thanks,
-Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Circular airlock!
|
| (...) That's magnificent! It reminds me of the "transporter" on my old Star Trek playset (wow, that was a LONG time ago--1977, I think) that worked on a similar principle. But I haven't thought about it since--that's an excellent employment of a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
