|
|
 | | Re: 60 degree problem
|
| (...) trying (...) :-/ That's pretty much the same conclusion I came to. Unfortunately, I can't get enough stability from that with the current design. <sigh> Back to the drawing board <grumble grumble bitch bitch> I _liked_ that design too. Maybe (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: 60 degree problem
|
| (...) A 3 blade rotor will give the same angle geometry but I don't beleive it is what James is asking. I believe he is asking how to anchor something to the top of this assembly that is connected to all three legs. Geometrically, there is no (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: 60 degree problem
|
| (...) Whoops, this is not what I thought. Typing too fast. If this is 2 plates, one with 2 fingers and one with 3 fingers on the end, which coupled together take the same space as a 1x5 plate would, these are "two finger" and "three finger" hinges. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: 60 degree problem
|
| (...) connect (...) my (...) these (...) Have you tried a Technic 3 blade rotor? It's not *quite* what you are trying to build, but I think it should be workable. Duane (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | Re: 60 degree problem
|
| (...) normally (...) to (...) a (...) Ok, it's fairly obvious I wasn't clear enough (I can't even figure out what I meant <grin>) so here is a second attempt. The part I am using as the major component of my foot design is the (aucZILLA (...) (26 years ago, 13-Jan-99, to lugnet.build)
|
|
