|
|
 | | Re: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| (...) real (...) girls (...) been (...) Perhaps the term "overtly sexy" has too much cultural (or personal) bias. In this case I'm refering to the plunging necklines or overdeveloped chests some of the "babe / wench" figures display. Specifically (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.minifigs)
| | | | | Re: Multi-story buildings - story height
|
| (...) Thanks for the input, everyone. I definitely seems that 6-7 is the norm, officially and unofficially. Unfortunately, that means I have to some serious thinking about my original plan, which was 9-10. I was just using 10 (including floor (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | Dragon arm variation
|
| As many of you know, the dragon's arms don't offer much flexibility. Well, I set out to fix that problem. Playing around with some miscellaneous pieces, I have designed arms that are far more useful than the originals. They can move up and down, (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.build)
| | | | | RE: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| Fair enough...In my 1978 Australian full range catalogue, space isn't shown at all, while in my instructions: 885,886,889,897 the (c) year in 1979, and in my partial catalogue [which from referring to other catalogues, I've dated to 1979] it shows (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.minifigs)
| | | | | Re: legos biggest mistake is...
|
| (...) Looks like it was '78 in the US. At least according to the Lugnet/Pause database. (24 years ago, 19-Jun-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.minifigs)
|
|
