| |
In lugnet.build.military, Shaun Sullivan writes:
>
> In e-mail, LFB wrote (and I beg LFB's approval, as this is reprinted here
> without express written consent, although I am willing to suffer any and all
> appropriate consequences for this breach of etiquette):
*boo hoo hoo* You cad, I chawwenge you to a DUEL! :)
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=83445
>
> It's hard to tell from the isometric view, but the top view and the side view
> look really really nice and accurate. Even the front and aft views look very
> nice, with the exception of some of these large "transitions" that I hope to
> address. Every now and then I've just been putting up a pic or two to mark my
> progress. Tonight I'll have a bunch of time, so I'll try to POVRay some
> different views to give the idea of the overall form a bit better. I'll also
> try to scan in some pics of the line/hull drawings I'm working from (again,
> your recommendation of Fock's book was a godsend, Lindsay ... my continuing
> thanks).
I'm glad you actually got a copy of the thing. I hope you'll
post lateral and dorsal views--I'd like to get a look at that
curvature. Do you actually have enough 1x1 technic beams to
put your master plan into operation, and will the tiny gap
between the brickface and the half-pin's stud cause any problems?
(That's why I couldn't use that method to affix the panels to
FdG, but you're not dealing with heavy fairings.)
> Overall, though, it *seems* to be going well. As you can kind-of see, it's
> leaving me with a good amount of space inside the hull itself for the various
> rooms, ladders, causeways, engines, bunks, storage lockers, and fuel tanks.
> Ideally, I'd even like to construct the real-life version so that it is pretty
> straightforward to separate the hull into above-the-waterline and
> below-the-waterline sections (which won't work that well if the interior rooms
> extend below the waterline ...). That way, I'd ideally be able to pose it in
> the water (that is, resting flat on blue plates with the sub-waterline section
> removed), and on a stand above the water (with the entire hull form exposed).
> We'll see how that goes ...
Good luck! A lot of the rooms in larger ships do straddle the
waterline, in part because the waterline varies depending on the
load the boat or ship is carrying. However, it wouldn't be a
problem if the upper section has to include part of the walls
of subsurface compartments, would it? There are no rules saying
that you *must* make the separation point a deck.
best
LFB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SNOT Boating, con't
|
| (...) I put up a couple more views. As much as I like POVRay, it unfortunately insists on a 3d perspective, so even when I want a simple top down or side projection view, you're stuck with some distortion on the ends. Ahh well, I suppose that is, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.boats)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SNOT Boating, con't (LONG)
|
| In e-mail, LFB wrote (and I beg LFB's approval, as this is reprinted here without express written consent, although I am willing to suffer any and all appropriate consequences for this breach of etiquette): (...) Hi Lindsay, At the front of the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-01, to lugnet.build.military, lugnet.boats)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
