 | | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) I didn't say that Lego should care, I said that I cared. They might care in that the US is their biggest market. And if it wasn't for the US they would probably be out of business right now. I am not sure but I bet that the Bionicle movies (...) (17 years ago, 9-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) Why should a Danish company interested in cutting costs and saving itself from financial ruin care about whether people in the US aren't employed as a result of their actions? And incidentally, you'd be quite wrong to think my countrymen would (...) (17 years ago, 9-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I'm sure they were a great help. (...) We've kinda split the discussion here. I'm discussing the side comment you made: "I think you made it clear you weren't happy paying (what was asked) for BS in its current state, isn't it better to for (...) (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
--snip-- (...) I suspect the Ambassadors may already have been in contact with Sean BICBW --snip-- (...) IJATOP (...) Surely this current exercise is useful for gauging what and how much public interest in an alternative to BS would be. Kevin didn't (...) (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) True enough, but it seems that he has a pretty good handle on that already, and if not, he seems like a pretty capable fellow and can ask himself without the aid of the Ambassadors. (...) Um, what? I merely meant he hasn't asked me (or anyone (...) (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I believe that MOCpages can't yet host certain LEGO-related non-image type files that BS presently hosts. Fortunately with this nice discussion here Sean should have a good idea of what people would like to be able to host there. (...) Does (...) (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what you mean by "full Lego related hosting solutions", but Mocpages springs to mind as one that probably comes close. (...) Who knows? He hasn't asked me yet, if that's what you mean. (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) There's not many things that actually deserve answers, and they usually involve public funds of some kind. (...) I can think of none that offer full Lego related hosting solutions. Most tend to be file dumps or image galleries but not both. If (...) (17 years ago, 7-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) Not really. Not any more important than the original question at least, and no less deserving of an answer. (...) There's a plethora of alternative solutions out there already. Take your pick. (...) I would've thought that particular task (...) (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
What's really being asked, I think, is more than just image hosting. That's a cheap commodity through various services. If it was just about putting images on the web, that problem's been solved. But it's more than that. I think at least three (...) (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX) !
|
