 | | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) At present is that really that important? At least with a collected list of suggestions it means that an alternate solution has somewhere to find ideas. I think you made it clear you weren't happy paying (what was asked) for BS in its current (...) (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) So what do you, as LEGO Ambassadors, propose to do? (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
I'd like to see: 1. Not only the ability to tag photos with a pre-selected list of keywords (as BrickShelf does) but see only folders/photos tagged with those words (like MOCPages). Also filtering by filetype. If I don't use LDraw (for instance), I (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I just want Brickshelf to survive, that's all. If Brickshelf can be improved with more features, great. If Brickshelf needs to charge fees, fine. But for me, I don't want another Johnny-come-lately, just what has worked in the past and will (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) I agree with most of the comments others have written. I would also like to add that I like the way Brickshelf allows you to see a lot of images on the same page – without excessive scrolling. When I'm browsing, I can see 30 images on the same (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
My thoughts: 1.Should limit non-paying users to only upload files (of any type) of a certain maximum file size (not image size, file size). 2.Should limit non-paying users so that they can only upload a certain size of files total (i.e. all the (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) There will never be an ideal image-hosting site since everyone has diffrent opinion on what that is :) But MY view on a ideal image-hosting site is like Brickshelf are today but with some added features like; 1. Owner being able to put comment (...) (17 years ago, 5-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
To me, this is a topic that the Ambassadors should be looking into and using their influence on. I am very grateful that they are polling the community to be sure that they have everyone's input before acting. Just reading through the other posts (...) (17 years ago, 4-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) Thomas: A lot of discussion HAS already happened - true enough. The LEGO Ambassadors have taken this concern very seriously, as it obviously impacts the community to a very great extent. We are addressing this issue with both the fans, and (...) (17 years ago, 4-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Your Thoughts on Image Hosting Sites...
|
|
(...) a simple interface like brickshelf. sign in, upload, done. (...) the ablity to change folder names not just discriptions have an account with user information "I.E. real name, city, state, age, club affiliations" that can be made public if (...) (17 years ago, 4-Aug-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
