 | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) While I agree and reiterate Dave's points, I think that LEGO sees the ambassador program a bit differently. They are not LEGO employees assigned as ambassadors to the AFOL community. I believe LEGO sees them as AFOL members assigned as (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) Just a point here. I think this is part of why the Ambassadors got that "Unbassador" logo that I'm sure everyone has seen floating around. Here's a perfect example of something that you could have shared with the community, but didn't and (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) That's still a little vague. I just think if the ambassadors are going to complain in the name of the community, the community should get a say in what they complain about. Personally, I think it'd be better to take just a couple of the (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) What's on the list? The standard range of complaints that you read about on this or other fora: complaints about colour and quality, piece and set design, themes, gender bias/availability, leaks, availability and pricing and so on. Why? (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) That surely doesn't apply to the 'Issues List' though. I for one would like to see what was on that list, and why. (...) I'm confused. How did they know thery were redesigned if they were kept secret? (...) Those kooky terrorists. (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
