| | Set 5909 - reprise . . . Jonathan Little
|
| | First off, I just want to thank everybody who responded to my first post about set 5909 (the tan bi-plane). Everybody has been a lot of help! I've heard from a few people that this was a TRU exclusive, packaged with some sort of case, or something, (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | |
| | | | Re: Set 5909 - reprise . . . James Howse
|
| | | | (...) There's a couple on the shelves in Big W across the road. ' course I'm in Australia and that's probably not much use to you butI thought you might want to know anyway. James from Oz (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Set 5909 - reprise . . . Gerwin Hassink
|
| | | | If you look at LugNet, there are at least three Treasure Raiders sets, the same content with different set numbers. One of them comes with a golden mumy storecase, the second is 'normal' and the third has 'non-U.S. version?' in its description. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | Re: Set 5909 - reprise . . . Kevin Knoot
|
| | | | (...) It wasn't a TRU exclusive, at least not in the USA. I bought one at Walmart, and two at Shopko (on sale for $10!). The set came with the previously mentioned mummy storage case, a very cool biplane, a black Scorpion Tracker-type car, a nice (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | 5909 found an available by phone was (Re: Set 5909 - reprise . . .) Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | (...) Well I have been following this a bit and I wanted to check before I responded. I have found some of these in an excellent store in Massachusetts. You cannot order over the internet but they are happy to take phone orders. I have no idea what (...) (25 years ago, 21-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 5909 found an available by phone was (Re: Set 5909 - reprise . . .) Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | I found this (with the gold mummy case) at Tuesday Morning for $15 for anyone that's interested. Look fast because it will be gone quick. Bruce (...) about (...) some (...) set (...) itself, (...) responded. (...) cannot (...) (25 years ago, 22-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |