 | | Re: Adventurers in 2000? —Richard Dee
|
| | | On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 20:18:06 GMT, Julie Krenz uttered the following profundities... (...) Hate to rain on your parade, but..... The pictures of the small figures are actually Rock Raiders. (25 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Adventurers in 2000? —Julie Krenz
|
| | | | (...) That's too bad. (And so nobody throws any Timmies at me... As I stated in my original post, I was just repeating what I had read on rtl. If I had know it to be true for sure I would have made a post in .announce.) Julie (25 years ago, 31-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adventurers in 2000? —Mark Lindsey
|
| | | | | (...) sure (...) Hey Julie, I won't throw one single Timmie at you. At least you tried to get some information up that no one else seems to have. I still haven't seen a scan of the above mentioned minifigs. Surely someone has them. Please help!!!!! (...) (25 years ago, 1-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adventurers in 2000? —Richard Dee
|
| | | | On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 18:35:40 GMT, julie krenz uttered the following profundities... (...) apologies, should i have appeared rude. i was as excited as everyone else when reading it, even having read the magazine that morning, thinking i might have (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Adventurers in 2000? —Julie Krenz
|
| | | | (...) I (...) sure (...) Nah, I just felt I had dissapointed some *very* excited people and thought I should repeat why I posted what I posted. :-) Julie (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| | | | |
