 | | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
| (...) I have it on fairly good authority that the arctic area at Legoland California is there more for a punchline to a joke than as a viable subtheme. Email me for specifics, so as not to ruin it for everyone. Still, though many on this posting (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
| (...) Egypt, (...) Alright, perhaps I laid it on a teensy bit too thick! ;-) I would love to see an Arctic (...) I think there are a lot more interesting things Lego could do with this series, that's all. I don't see the potential in the arctic set (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
| (...) series, (...) Hi Bruce, thanks for the movie pics again. By the way The Man Who Would Be King has got to be one of the best movies EVER made. I loved it. As for Adventurers 2000 I think we will probably see nothing new in the way of subthemes (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
| (...) I haven't seen this in years, but whoever suggested it was right on. Sean Connery and Michael Caine have both said it was their own personal favorite (that was a number of years ago, so they may have new favorites). (...) The only reason to go (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
| | | | | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
| (...) I thought you had suggested it, it must have been Steve Bliss. (...) of (...) I guess I was wrong about this. (...) Indian/Southeast (...) strong (...) added. (...) As always listening to you Bruce is like listening to the Gospels - everytime (...) (25 years ago, 25-Oct-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
| |
