 | | Re: Dinosaurs!
|
|
(...) jur-abs-ic park!? later ~ craig (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Dinosaurs!
|
|
(...) And of course the new dinosaurs can be mixed up with Wild West for that "Valley of Gwangi" feeling. Hooray! -Pete (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Dinosaurs!
|
|
Proceed immediately to: (URL) behold. So we go from mummies and spiders into "The Lost World". Let me be the first to say (and I'm sure many agree) that this is a pretty darn swell thing, a great direction for this theme to go. I can't wait for (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Movie list
|
|
In lugnet.adventurers, Mark Lindsey writes: <schnip!> (...) LEGO can't get me a girlfriend?!? <throws bricks down in disgust> MAN! I wasted all my time on this for NOTHING! *grin* That was good; now I've scared the cats. **sigh** -The Cheese, who is (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
|
|
(...) Hi Paul Yeah last week I posted to duplo and general a fantasy of mine that they would produce a full dino set and got carried away with the brilliance of this! Once i started thinking about how great it would be I wondered why they had never (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
|
|
I'm surprised more people haven't been talking about this here. :) I remember reading some of the earlier speculations, and I believe person suggested a dinosaur adventurer subtheme. Congratulations to whomever it was. I wonder how they'll work it (...) (26 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
|
|
(...) these would probably be duplo-saurs, rather than system dinos; giving a whole new meaning to the term,"terrible lizard". later ~ craig (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
|
|
I figured the first catalog would show up in a Star Wars set. It would probably be a 1999 set that has been in production the whole year, therefore they would be making a new run of them in time for the Solstice. KL (...) some (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Adventurers and dinosaurs in 2000
|
|
Others probably already heard but here's a snippet from a post to rtl: Thad A. Doria <tad@journals.uchicago.edu> wrote in message news:3826E8E0.4A7B@j...ago.edu... (...) This is from a thread about a guy wanting pics of 2000 castle and arctic (in (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Movie list
|
|
(...) I do agree Christian. The wording should have been more specific and I'll have to work on that next time. (...) Once more for the record. The post where I said let's try to "beat" the other groups was very tongue-in-cheek. I thought that would (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Movie list
|
|
(...) Thanks Craig! After last week I'll take all the support I can get. Talk about a shark tank. I was wondering where you guys had gone. Cheers, Mark L P.S. Your site is awesome! Keep putting up everything. I WANT TO SEE MORE! P.S.S. Did you ever (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Movie list
|
|
(...) I'd say it flared up like a super nova for about one day. Then Todd posted up saying that it was a reasonable topic as long as it was not in the general area. As soon as the naysayers read that I am sure their ire dried up. (...) Well it all (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) I would direct you to this post by Todd. (URL) for your opinions, they are your opinions and mine are mine. I am just glad we both have a forum to say just that. Cheers, Mark L (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
|
(...) Yes... Arctic would be nice. Or how about some combo of Adventurers/Spaceport? Maybe the Spanish Missions? Or the ummm... Sewer dump explorers? Well Hey! It's a new category for lugnet.underground... heheh. AlEx RoOdE Take the Star Wars quiz: (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
|
(...) I (...) sure (...) Nah, I just felt I had dissapointed some *very* excited people and thought I should repeat why I posted what I posted. :-) Julie (26 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
|
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 18:35:40 GMT, julie krenz uttered the following profundities... (...) apologies, should i have appeared rude. i was as excited as everyone else when reading it, even having read the magazine that morning, thinking i might have (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Movie list
|
|
(...) I too has been out of office all week and missed the discussion. It was a good idea to call for adventure movies. But looking back it should have been "most inspiring" adventure movies and not "greatest", which made some argue about the (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Movie list
|
|
(...) ~ me too! ditto to all that, and salutations to mark! later ~ craig (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Movie list
|
|
Well, this certainly flared up while I wasn't looking. I must have missed a staff meeting or something - I'll pay more attention in future. Just a quick note of support - I think the movie list thing was a cracker (that's a good thing). It shouldn't (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) Hmmm.... There are several .off-topic groups. Most of the stupid threads (sorry, but that's what I think of them as) end up being moved to .off-topic.fun. I never read the Adventurers Movie thread, which I assume this is about, mainly because (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
