 | | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
|
|
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 18:35:40 GMT, julie krenz uttered the following profundities... (...) apologies, should i have appeared rude. i was as excited as everyone else when reading it, even having read the magazine that morning, thinking i might have (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Movie list
|
|
(...) I too has been out of office all week and missed the discussion. It was a good idea to call for adventure movies. But looking back it should have been "most inspiring" adventure movies and not "greatest", which made some argue about the (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Movie list
|
|
(...) ~ me too! ditto to all that, and salutations to mark! later ~ craig (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Movie list
|
|
Well, this certainly flared up while I wasn't looking. I must have missed a staff meeting or something - I'll pay more attention in future. Just a quick note of support - I think the movie list thing was a cracker (that's a good thing). It shouldn't (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) Hmmm.... There are several .off-topic groups. Most of the stupid threads (sorry, but that's what I think of them as) end up being moved to .off-topic.fun. I never read the Adventurers Movie thread, which I assume this is about, mainly because (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) a (...) Oh gawd - there's a lugnet.admin.general and a lugnet.general. Whatever. Please tell me *you* are teasing! Bruce (I'm teasing...*this* time) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) No, I wanted to shunt it _away_from_ lugnet.general, not _over_to_ lugnet.general... (are you teasing again? ;-) --Todd [followups to lugnet.admin.general] (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Egyptian Temple - A new undertaking
|
|
(...) Yeah, I was playing around a bit again last night, and actually, I was finding that 1x slopes and 2x slopes are actually what I might need more of... I also tried making the statues in multicolor grey/tan, but that looked kind of silly against (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Egyptian Temple - A new undertaking
|
|
(...) my (...) entryway, (...) side (...) I'd agree here... black & dark grey would work well - there's a decent selection of black slopes that are fairly easily gotten ahold of, and small dk- grey plates are getting more common in the sets - enough (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) I don't think I said anything except a brief note via email to about 5 or 6 people (at once) and said, TSL> ok guys, time to take this off-topic thread out of .general" TSL> TSL> --Todd I don't have any problem with movie lists being discussed (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Egyptian Temple - A new undertaking
|
|
(...) to (...) Hey Dave, I read your post on this a couple of days ago and have been thinking on it ever since. The best idea I could come up with was to do the statues in black. I have seen a lot of Egyptian statues in black and even if paint was (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) pieces (...) Thanks for the kind words Bruce. I feel better after having read some of this afternoon's comments. The bottom line is that I love the Adventurers theme and I only want to share that love with others. I am glad to know some of you (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: DATventures
|
|
David Eaton <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message news:FKn70x.5Kv@lugnet.com... (...) Actually, www.lugnet.com/cad/datsville is the place to check out--the geocities site is now just for the image map (which you can access from (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
I thought the whole thing was suffering from topic drift and I had stopped answering on the parts I thought were drifting (TV = Movie). That's why I thought Todd shunted it over to general (which I don't read). I don't have a big problem with that (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) This is the first post that made me laugh all day. Thanks for the levity Tom. Mark L (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) Thanks, you see my point perfectly. (...) We agree entirely on this as well. (...) Thanks for your well timed and well put words Roger. I am glad you liked the list. Play well, Mark L (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) Mark.... Not one to sit idly by (well...not -usually- <grin>), a relevant thought occurs to me. I took the list you assembled to be a matter of research into -sources of inspiration- for those of us who are interested in this theme, and not as (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
Mark Lindsey <markwars@fcmail.com> wrote in message news:FKoLC4.84B@lugnet.com... (...) Ok, Personally, I wasn't into the adventurers movie thing that was floating around, but then I exercised my 'don't read that section' prerogative and moved on. (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) to relate a wider group of topics to a specific Lego theme. Mark L (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
|
|
(...) get smacked occasionally. He is most often correct. We should (...) (as I sometimes do), I always try to remember to relate the (...) LEGO, then I shouldn't be posting it there. That's why (...) I hear you. I think that I was more upset by the (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
