  |    | Re: Adventurers in 2000?
  |  
  | 
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 18:35:40 GMT, julie krenz uttered the following profundities... (...) apologies, should i have appeared rude. i was as excited as everyone else when reading it, even having read the magazine that morning, thinking i might have (...)   (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Movie list
  |  
  | 
(...) I too has been out of office all week and missed the discussion. It was a good idea to call for adventure movies. But looking back it should have been "most inspiring" adventure movies and not "greatest", which made some argue about the (...)   (26 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Movie list
  |  
  | 
(...) ~ me too! ditto to all that, and salutations to mark! later ~ craig    (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Movie list
  |  
  | 
Well, this certainly flared up while I wasn't looking. I must have missed a staff meeting or something - I'll pay more attention in future. Just a quick note of support - I think the movie list thing was a cracker (that's a good thing). It shouldn't (...)   (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
  |  
  | 
(...) Hmmm.... There are several .off-topic groups. Most of the stupid threads (sorry, but that's what I think of them as) end up being moved to .off-topic.fun. I never read the Adventurers Movie thread, which I assume this is about, mainly because (...)   (26 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
  |  
  | 
(...) a (...) Oh gawd - there's a lugnet.admin.general and a lugnet.general. Whatever. Please tell me *you* are teasing! Bruce (I'm teasing...*this* time)    (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
  |  
  | 
(...) No, I wanted to shunt it _away_from_ lugnet.general, not _over_to_ lugnet.general... (are you teasing again? ;-) --Todd [followups to lugnet.admin.general]    (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Egyptian Temple - A new undertaking
  |  
  | 
(...) Yeah, I was playing around a bit again last night, and actually, I was finding that 1x slopes and 2x slopes are actually what I might need more of... I also tried making the statues in multicolor grey/tan, but that looked kind of silly against (...)   (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Egyptian Temple - A new undertaking
  |  
  | 
(...) my (...) entryway, (...) side (...) I'd agree here... black & dark grey would work well - there's a decent selection of black slopes that are fairly easily gotten ahold of, and small dk- grey plates are getting more common in the sets - enough (...)   (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers)   
   | 
 |   | 
  |    | Re: Toward LUGNET equality
  |  
  | 
(...) I don't think I said anything except a brief note via email to about 5 or 6 people (at once) and said, TSL> ok guys, time to take this off-topic thread out of .general" TSL> TSL> --Todd I don't have any problem with movie lists being discussed (...)   (26 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)   
   |