 | | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) It wasn't a call, it was a prediction -- a doubt. (...) It's seeming more and more like it would be a useful feature to be able to flag an article and have some sort of gentle automated note sent to the poster as a conern. (To avoid followups (...) (25 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) That sounds like a good idea. The only problem that I can see is that some people might view the automated message as spam (even though it's not). Is anyone reading this besides you and me? Some more comment would probably be helpful here. -- (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) Well, no, not if it's worded nicely. Now, if a 'repeated' offender would get the same message over and over again - now that would be spam. But a 'repeated offender' as such would be needed to be dealt with differently... Is there a way to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) be (...) Hrmmmm - some people (who say things they shouldn't be saying here, according to their agreement to the T&C) might think it is spam that they get an automated response reminded them that they shouldn't be saying things like that? My (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) If it isn't anonymous (ie - LUGNET reads the posting cookie, or the person submitting the problem post has some other form of identification), and only one mail is sent per problem post.. then I agree. Or rather, just something to stop someone (...) (25 years ago, 19-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
