To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 582
  Re: Murfle?
 
(...) quick answers: (...) no. (...) not yet. (...) no. At least, not a different one. 'updating' would probably be good though. (...) completely understandable. I agree. (...) is it the lack of clarity then? potential for abuse? ..? (...) I (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)  
 
  Re: Murfle?
 
(...) Many parts snipped out, just to shorten things up. You made some great points and reminded my why I continue to return to Lugnet, and thank you for taking the time to respond so throughly. (...) Yes, totally. Both of those issues concern me a (...) (19 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)  
 
  Re: Murfle?
 
(...) It's as the others in this thread said. The "murfling" was done in the past. It's not something being done on posts right now. If it were to be adopted, I'm sure users would be notified. I don't know why they were not before the act was (...) (19 years ago, 1-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 
  Re: Murfle?
 
[snip] Thanks for the positive feedback, Janey. -Suz (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR