| |
> In lugnet.admin.terms, Suzanne Rich Green wrote:
> > In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote:
Many parts snipped out, just to shorten things up. You made some great points
and reminded my why I continue to return to Lugnet, and thank you for taking the
time to respond so throughly.
> is it the lack of clarity then? potential for abuse? ..?
Yes, totally. Both of those issues concern me a great deal.
> > Auctions in the wrong forum??? [...] Off topic stuff???
> Appreciation for LUGNET as such, and a
> desire to preserve its crafting is ideally what would drive behaviors, rather
> than "rules", because rules are made to be broken. Do you know what I mean? Do
> you agree?
Yes, I do agree, sadly it's a very difficult line to draw in the sand. As long
as human nature exists, limits will be push, regardless if there are hard and
set rules or not. I have never felt the job either you or Todd has is easy, and
I have appreciated every effort made, especially the communication that has been
open to us. For example here, I am not only please you took the effort to
respond, but I feel that my concerns have been listened to, and for that I am
grateful.
> > Over use of question marks??????
>
> Ooo! maybe! ;-) just kidding.
Well I do tend to be a bit too "dramatic at times"... wink.
> > For the third time, just to say "yeah, I know, not my sandbox",[...]
> Please don't be uncomfortable expressing your thoughts here. They are important
> and do shape/contribute to what happens. LUGNET's users have brought about its
> best features, IMO, via their taking time to provide feedback.
Thanks, I really appreciate that. I have struggled between biting my tongue,
and wanting to scream... its hard not to be passionate about something that is
important to us, (for many of us, Lugnet is like a second home) but also easy to
forget that we arent doing the work, nor paying the bills to keep this site up
and running.
> > could we have at least a bit of feedback of what this will mean for Lugnet.
> Generally:
> Things are actively in transition again....
Excellent news and I totally understanding life getting in the way, happens to
the best of us.
> Specifically:
> I'll investigate this issue and get back to you. Sorry I don't have better
> answers yet.
Understood.
> As LUGNET seems to be shifting back to my center stage, this is probably a good
> time for me to ask for help. I feel kinda stupid doing so because it's been such
> a long time since people offered support, and now many forums have become
> silent. This site needs a revival, not mere continuation.
Well Suz, just as I offered in person last year at BF, I am again offering any
support I can offer. Drop me an email if there is anything I can do.
Thanks,
Janey "Red Brick"
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Murfle?
|
| (...) quick answers: (...) no. (...) not yet. (...) no. At least, not a different one. 'updating' would probably be good though. (...) completely understandable. I agree. (...) is it the lack of clarity then? potential for abuse? ..? (...) I (...) (18 years ago, 31-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
