 | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | (...) Does this post and the new process and authorising of said reminder, not imply that their will be more of presence of it being used? Respectfully requested Janey "Red Brick" (20 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) "more of presence" ?? Did you mean higher probability or something similar? If so... Not necessarily. (20 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | (...) This actually makes no sense to me then (and yes, please bare with me, since I have 40 ounces of Bailey in me, being the New Year et al, plus the added affect of various "smokebles"..... )..... I have only one question then........ Why bother (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Happy New Year, Janey... Sorry if my answer was a bit cryptic there! What I am trying to say is that if the new policy means that people act more in accordance with the ToS than they have in the recent past, it may well be that no time outs (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) [snip] So I guess that means you're hoping the "increased presence" is just making the policy more obvious to newbies and forgetfuls? ROSCO (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | (...) snipped the state I am in (...) And to you. (...) Np, just looking for clarity. (...) Yes, I fully understand that wishful thinking, but considering I'm here posting while fully loaded on New Years, and to quote Mick "You can't always get what (...) (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | |
