 | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Kevin Bannister
|
| | | (...) Auctions create a lot more traffic than regular sales. At least thats what I've always thought was the reason (it's the reason why I don't read RTL anymore, anyway). They clutter up a newsgroup. Maybe Todd feels the same way? (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | |
| | | | | (canceled) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | guito <guito@guito.dhs.org> wrote in message news:slrn8f6lu7.ebp....ome.com... (...) solicitations. (...) As of _now_ there have been 102 posts to .auction and 103 to .bst in the last 7 days. If you add to that the trade posts dotted around all the (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: auction vs non-auction double standard? —Mike Poindexter
|
| | | | (...) Not really. Seller run auctions create more traffic because of the constant updates, but ebay auction announcements are usually a single or 2 shot deal. Many B-S-T posts fall in that level of traffic. Yet, many people seem to dislike ebay (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
