 | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Keith Goldman
|
| | | This could be the beginning of the end for me... "Making disparaging remarks about the personal integrity of others merely to make a point" So I can't call Soren Roberts the smelly village idiot, with all the integrity of a back-room pornographer? (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —David Koudys
|
| | | | | In lugnet.admin.terms, Keith Goldman wrote: <snip> (...) What????? These new rules mean that we can't lay down the smack??? K, I'm a changin' my vote! ;) Dave K (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Um, as I understand it the truth is always a defense against charges of libel. So you should be OK. Or are you saying he's not actually those things? I get so confused. (1) More seriously, and this is a real problem that I don't know the real (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update — Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | (...) I'd say it's a matter of intent. "Smack" and banter = OK, so long as it's clear to smacker and smackee that it's all in fun, not a serious slam. And as long as it's not scatalogical or profane (remember, that's what email's for!) I wouldn't (...) (19 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —Nick Kappatos
|
| | | | (...) 1) You have some nerve to speak your piece on back-room pornograpers. I know back-room pornographers, sir; you are no back-room pornographer. Too long has the plight of the BRP gone ignored. BRP's work in our schools, our churches, our (...) (19 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update —C. L. GunningCook
|
| | | | In lugnet.admin.terms, Nick Kappatos wrote: Snipped some smack... Good smack always trumps a poorly thought out insult. My disclaimer: Theoretically all post are hypothetical. (pinched that from a forum that puts our idea of insults to shame) (...) (...) (19 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| | | | |
