 | | Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) probably needed is a parallel to 11 that deals with non auction "offers for sale" posts, ne? (...) How about something similar to this: (11a?). (do not) Post offers or announcements of items for sale, offers to buy, wanted notices, offers to (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Market Terms Modification (Was Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct) —Kevin Salm
|
| | | | | (...) I like it 100%. It is more concise than I could write, too. __Kevin Salm__ (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | In lugnet.admin.terms, Larry Pieniazek writes: [snip] (...) .loc.au has been tolerant of such posts (i.e. the natives don't complain). However, such posts are definitely not techically allowed. This was confirmed in July (see (URL) ) and as recently (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Thanks for the clarification, Richie... I confess when I penned that screed I hadn't gone and checked the charter, I was working from memory. But I think you'd agree that a loc group has a more well defined set of users than a non specific (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
