To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 421
420  |  422
Subject: 
Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 05:00:53 GMT
Viewed: 
7137 times
  
In lugnet.admin.terms, Suzanne D. Rich writes:

Do folks have any suggestions for re-wording of number 11 of T&C:
http://www.lugnet.com/admin/terms/agreement

I think 11 is OK as a rule about auction announcements or updates, what's
probably needed is a parallel to 11 that deals with non auction "offers for
sale" posts, ne?

If you come up with something concrete and reasonable, I'll only need to edit
the  text and write an announcement to publish an update. right? But if it
means a "definition of advertising" issue, I haven't got time right now. I'm
sorry.

How about something similar to this:

(11a?). (do not) Post offers or announcements of items for sale, offers to
buy, wanted notices, offers to obtain for others, or other market or
commerce related material to groups outside the market hierarchy, unless the
group explicitly allows such offers (for example, at the time of this
writing, lugnet.loc.au and possibly some other groups in the loc hierarchy
do allow such postings). Please use good judgement in how to construe
"market or commerce related material"



Message has 2 Replies:
  Market Terms Modification (Was Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct)
 
(...) I like it 100%. It is more concise than I could write, too. __Kevin Salm__ (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)
  Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all?
 
In lugnet.admin.terms, Larry Pieniazek writes: [snip] (...) .loc.au has been tolerant of such posts (i.e. the natives don't complain). However, such posts are definitely not techically allowed. This was confirmed in July (see (URL) ) and as recently (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.loc.au)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all?
 
Alas... (...) true. (...) Do folks have any suggestions for re-wording of number 11 of T&C: (URL) you come up with something concrete and reasonable, I'll only need to edit the text and write an announcement to publish an update. right? But if it (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR