To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 420
419  |  421
Subject: 
Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 04:04:36 GMT
Viewed: 
7905 times
  
Alas...

  http://news.lugnet.com/build/?n=12637

:-\

In lugnet.lego.direct, Frank Filz writes:
> I would point out that currently posting any market posting other than
> an auction posting anywhere within Lugnet is not against the TOS.

true.

> I expect the TOS will get updated at some point when there are no more
> important issues to be dealt with (the simple fact is that there have
> been very few misplaced market posts over the past months).

Do folks have any suggestions for re-wording of number 11 of T&C:
  http://www.lugnet.com/admin/terms/agreement

If you come up with something concrete and reasonable, I'll only need to edit
the  text and write an announcement to publish an update. right? But if it
means a "definition of advertising" issue, I haven't got time right now. I'm
sorry.

-Suz



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all?
 
(...) probably needed is a parallel to 11 that deals with non auction "offers for sale" posts, ne? (...) How about something similar to this: (11a?). (do not) Post offers or announcements of items for sale, offers to buy, wanted notices, offers to (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR