To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 420
419  |  421
Subject: 
Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 04:04:36 GMT
Viewed: 
7117 times
  
Alas...

  http://news.lugnet.com/build/?n=12637

:-\

In lugnet.lego.direct, Frank Filz writes:
I would point out that currently posting any market posting other than
an auction posting anywhere within Lugnet is not against the TOS.

true.

I expect the TOS will get updated at some point when there are no more
important issues to be dealt with (the simple fact is that there have
been very few misplaced market posts over the past months).

Do folks have any suggestions for re-wording of number 11 of T&C:
  http://www.lugnet.com/admin/terms/agreement

If you come up with something concrete and reasonable, I'll only need to edit
the  text and write an announcement to publish an update. right? But if it
means a "definition of advertising" issue, I haven't got time right now. I'm
sorry.

-Suz



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all?
 
(...) probably needed is a parallel to 11 that deals with non auction "offers for sale" posts, ne? (...) How about something similar to this: (11a?). (do not) Post offers or announcements of items for sale, offers to buy, wanted notices, offers to (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.admin.terms)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR