 | | Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info —James Powell
|
| | | (...) Yes, but they could have posted the "request" or "Order" (depending on view) to .Lego.direct. (the one that was sent to Todd that caused him to withdraw the posts from pubilc display) That is what I was meaning. I would hope LSI will put (...) (24 years ago, 13-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) Give it up - probably won't happen. Why should they do it anyway? If they define a policy to be [---] then they might somehow be bound to that, if for no other reason than PR. If they choose to simply remain silent, which is certainly their (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info —James Powell
|
| | | | (...) stand (...) OK, am I to assume then that _anything_ I read on the web is fair game? I'm going to need a 2nd Geocities account then!---to put stuff like this up on, and link to. (and await nasty legal threatening letters from) (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | (...) No, what you're free to do is use some common sense and accept the consequences of your actions, should there be any. I personally don't care what you (or anyone else) posts or doesn't post with regards to this or similar "pre-public" info. I (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| | | | |
