|
|
 | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: rewrite squad car
|
| Anthony Garrison wrote: Hmm, can we have this obvious SPAM deleted? I know Lugnet does not normally delete posts, but this is eggregarious. Frank (18 years ago, 30-Nov-06, to lugnet.duplo, lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
| Hi David, thank you very much for your suggestions. (...) I guess I catch it. Well, the basically (and let's face it: the theoretically) requirement is: "By using LUGNET, be at least 18 years old. Otherwise ask your parents for permission". If they (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
| (...) You're right, that's not an issue, NFW. (...) I guess I know it, one could consider it as "bad taste", but as far as I remember, it was made too simple to be seriously glorifying violence. (...) It launched a discussion, but definitive is (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New Terms of Use for LUGNET
|
| (...) Hey, I guess I'm okay with Rene's description, but as Didier said, this will come down to theory vs practice. I'm sure there would be no problem with something (URL) a battle scene>. Almost everthing I could imagine would fall into this realm. (...) (18 years ago, 19-Sep-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
|
