|
|
 | | Re: Murfle?
|
| (...) The murfle concept was originally thought up way back when we had an Admin team. I forget who had the idea, but Todd named it (it has that sort of Todd flare to it). The concept was exactly as Tim described it - a compromise between (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | | | Re: Murfle?
|
| (...) ...snip... (...) ...snip... (...) I might be speaking out of turn, but it's my understanding that for testing purposes, some of the posts that were very clearly out of bounds of the ToS were murfled during the development of this function. I (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | | | Re: Murfle?
|
| (...) It seems to me the message remains the same on the NNTP server, and more importantly the search index, so searching for any word in the original post will retrieve it. In fact, searching for one of the known "questionable" words in the post (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | | | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
| (...) I listen to Larry. I offer this: Please excuse my perceived auction spam. Respect my follow up and my intentions not to get carried away. Rather understand I feel must reach a core audience that may not have known about it otherwise. As for (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | | | Re: Murfle?
|
| (...) Tim, I agree, to a point, I don't really care if LUGNET decides that "murflement" is THEIR answer. I don't know Suz or Todd, to any great degree aside from having the pleasure of meeting them both, but I feel I have conversed with Todd enough (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
|
