 | | Re: Murfle?
|
|
(...) ...snip... (...) ...snip... (...) I might be speaking out of turn, but it's my understanding that for testing purposes, some of the posts that were very clearly out of bounds of the ToS were murfled during the development of this function. I (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Murfle?
|
|
(...) It seems to me the message remains the same on the NNTP server, and more importantly the search index, so searching for any word in the original post will retrieve it. In fact, searching for one of the known "questionable" words in the post (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) I listen to Larry. I offer this: Please excuse my perceived auction spam. Respect my follow up and my intentions not to get carried away. Rather understand I feel must reach a core audience that may not have known about it otherwise. As for (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Murfle?
|
|
(...) Tim, I agree, to a point, I don't really care if LUGNET decides that "murflement" is THEIR answer. I don't know Suz or Todd, to any great degree aside from having the pleasure of meeting them both, but I feel I have conversed with Todd enough (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Murfle?
|
|
It's also curious that a search for "murfl" turns up nothing. Still, I think it's a good idea to rein in some of the meanness... (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Hi Lar, My problem here is that Eric is entirely unrepentant of his own bad behaviour. He needs to be made to see that what he did was wrong. Many people have tried the polite approach to him on this and other topics, others (myself included (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Yep. To summarise, Eric's in the wrong regarding posting auctionspam, and regarding using material of others without permission, and you and your gang of trolls are using that as an excuse to be disruptive, make fun of him, and egg him on (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
| |
| | Re: Murfle?
|
|
(...) I think it's a good compromise solution. It is still possible to see the original message but it requires action rather than accident. People are not meant to swear on Lugnet and if they don't pull their message then I think this is a fair (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) NO - it is NOT fun. SOMEBODY be the bigger man and just walk away, please. Mark LUGNET member 1634 (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Murfle?
|
|
Curious, I just happened to have this brought to my attention, (URL) and forgive me if this has been announced or discussed, but is this a new "feature" of Lugnet, and will we be seeing more of this in the future? Janey "Red Brick" (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms) !!
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Mark deserves a proper answer, as do the many people who have raised perfectly valid concerns only to have you either ignore them or post nonsense, if not outright abuse in response. (...) Another non-response. If it's still too complicated (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Reasoning in reverse. Morose. Who asked you? (...) I fully expect rablerousers like you to peep up. (...) The more you pay attention to my stuff, the more I make you my bitches. You know that saying? You should, you have been doing it well for (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Then perhaps you should've responded to (URL) this> with something other than "eh heh." What kind of way is that to treat a 'buddy'? (...) Thoughts entering your head do seem to be a rare occurrence. The fact is it was your duty to check first (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) hi, Tim. (...) Unrepentant to people who have axes to grind with me? Not likely. If you can understand that, then perhaps you'll start to get it. (...) That is a relative circumstance, not a direct officiality in anyway. As much love as I have (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Eric, Given the number of people complaining about your actions I would say you broke both the letter and the spirit of the 'law'. Is it comradery to do something that annoys many other people and be completely unrepentant about it? Is it (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms) !
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
Tim, there is such a divide when it comes to the Letter of the Law and Spirit of the Law. The letter of the law is influential, no doubt, however the greater challenge is for us to embrace the spirit of comradery. As for others, libelous slander is (...) (18 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
Dear Mark, (...) When have I flamed or trolled Eric on lugnet? I have flamed him once on jlug where flaming is allowed but only after he was rude to me. (...) I'm not really seeing your point here Mark unless you think I would like to turn lugnet (...) (18 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) Small correction here - the "You" at the front of that sentence was supposed to be "People here". Not saying you (Tim) have not done it, but it has been done in great numbers by the group as a whole, and that is what I mean to convey. (18 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) The point is when Eric did it there was a flame storm because of it and the first time had really the same result. So your defense that this is somehow ok because he has been told before is off. Flaming and trolling somebody for any reason is (...) (18 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
|
| |
| | Brain Damage
|
|
(...) AND (...) AND (...) Careful with that axe, Eugene. Money Eclipse Wish You Were Here UmmaGumma Time? Shine On You Crazy Diamond "The Lunatic is on the grass"? "And when the cloudbursts thunder in your ear You shout and no-one seems to hear And (...) (19 years ago, 20-Dec-05, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
