 | | Re: Signature Image Abuse —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | (...) You can do that now by putting an image in you post --Orion (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Signature Image Abuse —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) right - that was my point. The fact that you could put it in a sig is the same thing, only easier. Just wanted to point out something to consider when allowing inline images. Dan (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Signature Image Abuse — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Of course in practice it wouldn't be a very effective way for someone to snoop because of image caching in clients. They'd log a few hits here and there but not likely enough for any meaningful tracking. --Todd (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| | | | |
