| |
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Tim Courtney writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Dan Boger writes:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:38:06PM +0000, Scott A wrote:
> > > > Any chance of getting the coding to display ?emoticons? as graphics?
> > > >
> > > > !:-)
> > > >
> > > > emoticons:
> > > > http://www.cknow.com/ckinfo/emoticons.htm
> > >
> > > you couldn't pay me to do it.
> >
> > One place on the net we are still free from them! :-)
>
> You're strengthening my case! ;)
How so? Is your rationale, 'everybody's doing it?' ;-)
> It's no big deal.
>
> I like them; they are much warmer. Interestingly, my news reader
> auto-converts. ;)
Well, there you have it then. I'm not against having emoticions as an option
for those who like them, but in more cases than not I strongly prefer
plain-text emoticons. And I think you have your answer on that one from Dan :-)
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: emoticons ;)
|
| I always liked *<:-)= Santa Claus O-) Scuba Diver :) *<O-)= Santa Claus on vacation in the Bahamas Try that with emoticons! :) Dave K (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: emoticons ;)
|
| (...) You're strengthening my case! ;) It's no big deal. I like them; they are much warmer. Interestingly, my news reader auto-converts. ;) Scott A (22 years ago, 26-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
