 | | Lugnet Chat
|
|
This was discussed at some length in this thread (URL) just thought i'd bring it up again. ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Chat
|
|
(...) Does not email authentication kill it being realtime (unless you are a member signed in)? Jude (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Chat
|
|
(...) I believe it was going to be a proper chat system like IRC, so email auth wouldn't come into it. If you were implied sarcasm then I missed it ... too tired :) Dan (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Chat
|
|
(...) No sarcasm intended, I was thinking of identity theft issues. Jude (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Chat
|
|
(...) Some thoughts on chat and identity theft issues: I wouldn't generally think of NNTP or e-mail as being the clients of choice for a chat room, I would see logging on through a web client as being the means of use. Of course this might make chat (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Chat
|
|
"Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@rogers.com> wrote in message news:Gw7o4o.2pM@lugnet.com... (...) If it was built on IRC you could require authentication on connection using your Lugnet member id and password, and have it all tied together. That way (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet Chat
|
|
(...) I'd make the suggestion that maybe it's only available to members (an added benefit of membership) or at least have a room (or rooms) available to members only, and the identity displayed is the name on your membership page (or an alias (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
