Subject:
|
Re: Auto-reply on admin accounts@lugnet.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 May 2002 23:12:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
858 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ben Roller writes:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Jude Beaudin writes:
> > I know it says basically nothing but at least we know that you have received
> > our requests, suggestions, complaints, salutations, whatever...
>
> Well, what about this: if the email doesn't bounce it got there. Does email
> ever get just lost? Knowing that my message reached Suz's inbox doesn't
> tell me that she read it. Perhaps a "I read your message" standard reply
> would be ok, but IMO an auto-reply would be worthless.
If you find messages not being answered, you can always set the "notify when
delivered" and/or "notify when read" flag on the email.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Auto-reply on admin accounts@lugnet.com
|
| (...) which would only work if the reciever end is set up to reply to those - which most mail servers do not... I guess the only real way to be sure it hasn't been lost (somewhere in the folders of mail) is to ping (politely) after a reasonable (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Auto-reply on admin accounts@lugnet.com
|
| (...) Well, what about this: if the email doesn't bounce it got there. Does email ever get just lost? Knowing that my message reached Suz's inbox doesn't tell me that she read it. Perhaps a "I read your message" standard reply would be ok, but IMO (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
