 | | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) good ;) But that is not what you said I was asking for. So I am glad it is NOW yes, but I don't think it is "still yes". (...) I am sorry you took that as disrespectful. It was not the intention. More on this below (1). (...) See, I would (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) That was really a not cool thing of you to just say. (...) The extent to which any given group is "on-topic" (e.g., LEGO-focused) or "off-topic" (e.g., non-LEGO) is not a 0 or 1 but a fuzzy value in-between. For example, many posts in the .loc (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) lol, whatever Todd. Look - everybody has brain farts - Leonard just happend to have a very large one here (I assume). I am not, and did not say he is like that in general - just on that one point. There is a difference between these: But my 3 (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
(...) quite amazing how this is revolving around how a lugnet admin actually did not ignore you, replied to your postm, and made you feel like a responsible person of society, and you blew up at him and judged his intelligence to that of a (...) (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: SWM AFOL in Boston seeking SF
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Mark Papenfuss wrote: <snip> (...) Wow. And I thought I was arrogant. ;) Dave K (20 years ago, 1-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
