Subject:
|
Re: Why these news groups were created
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 23:21:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5097 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, John Neal wrote:
| |
| |
WHAT GRAPHIC CONVERSATIONS?!?!?!?
|
Please. Go do a search for “oral sex”, for instance, and you tell me.
|
http://news.lugnet.com/people/lgbt/?q=oral
Just because you find content in other areas to be objectionable is no excuse to
lay it at their feet.
| |
| |
LUGNET is not a sexetorium.
|
I’ll take your word for it, because I think you made it up;-)
|
Whoops, I spelled it wrong. It’s “sexiteria”. I was watching the TESB
commentary when I typed this, so I couldn’t just pop in the first Futurama DVD.
| |
That’s not quite fair to say. I have always been a little uncomfortable
discussing adult topics on LUGNET, but this was the proverbial straw that
motivated me to begin this conversation addressing this topic.
|
And to lump in all of .o-t and .people with .o-t.d and .people.LGBT as being
completely inappropriate for children? Yeah, that’s totally believable.
| |
| |
is not a place for LGBTs to
announce and describe their latest conquest, discuss which videos they’ve
rented, or have online-sex. It’s a place where they can congregate and find
comfort and support in dealing with the ill-treatment they receive from
society.
|
Maybe, maybe not. I was curious, and so I
asked what the purpose was for the
group. HERE is the answer I got.
It appears that the group will not be anything like what you’ve described.
|
It appears that the group is still defining itself, but the most relevent fact
here is that the LGBTs have shown no indication that they are interested in
filling .LGBT with graphic sexual content.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Which is just as well, because I didn't. (...) Ah, I just bought the set tonite. So, in fact, you were actually referring to a word that the Futurama writers made up:-) (...) No, just all completely off-topic. (...) Why this fixation on the (...) (20 years ago, 26-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Please. Go do a search for "oral sex", for instance, and you tell me. (...) I'll take your word for it, because I think you made it up;-) (...) That's not quite fair to say. I have always been a little uncomfortable discussing adult topics on (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
