 | | Re: Suggest scale modeling newsgroup
|
|
(...) I'm guessing it would be in the .build heirarchy. What would you suggest for the name? lugnet.build.scalemodel? As to whether we should have a .build.scalemodel, seems like a good idea to me. -Lenny (21 years ago, 26-Sep-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Suggest scale modeling newsgroup
|
|
Are there any feelings about whether there would be enough interest in a new newsgroup for discussion about scale modeling of real objects? I don't know where this would fit best in the newsgroup heirarchy; I leave that to the experts. I could see (...) (21 years ago, 26-Sep-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Request for LEGO Digital Designer Newsgroup
|
|
I would like to request a new LEGO Digital Designer Newsgroup; a subgroup of lugnet.cad ----> to be ----> lugnet.cad.ldd . Please. Thanks. Eric Sophie LEGO Digital Designer user (21 years ago, 25-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.suggestions) !
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Factory slipped a bit?
|
|
(...) snip (...) Seconded and spotlighted. There have been a lot of LEGO Factory postings in .cad, but since discussion of LEGO Factory could encompass .cad, .lego and various .market topics, I think it deserves its own newsgroup. Marc Nelson Jr. (...) (21 years ago, 25-Aug-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: suggest a "Factory" group
|
|
(...) I second this suggestion. The discussion is only going to become more frequent as more factory features are released. Tim (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | suggest a "Factory" group
|
|
There's already a lot of talk about LEGO Factory, scattered throughout the LUGNET hierarchy. I suggest a new group, probably at the root level (i.e. lugnet.factory). Best, Joe (21 years ago, 17-Aug-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
(...) I'm interested in how the Wiki and LUGNET can work together. more later. -Suz (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford wrote: A wiki logically does not need a group for discussion as a wiki can handle it itself...but yes a lugnet group for BrickWiki may be useful (who say I'm logical ?). (...) good Didier (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Group needed for BrickWiki?
|
|
Maybe under lugnet.publish? ROSCO (21 years ago, 18-Jul-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-numbered sets in the database (Re: Book Reviews, feedback)
|
|
(...) Yes Dave is right. Dave and Eric Strand have been digging up lots of obscure Samsonite sets that were sold by department stores. As an example a 1969 Sears catalog shows set #49-C-4418, which is a 335 piece basic set. Not exactly a user (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
