 | | LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006) — LUGNET Server
|
| | | This is a daily report of recent changes made to the data in the (URL) LUGNET Guide>. No new sets 1 updated set [LEGOSet 42884786761] Number: 42884786-1 (was: 42884786) Name: 6 in 1 Action Pack Theme: LEGO / SYSTEM Year: 2000 Pieces: 432 Figures: 6 (...) (18 years ago, 13-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.statistics, lugnet.admin.database, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) Hmm, do we really need these showing up in lugnet.admin.database? They never did before, and dramatically increase the traffic. Frank (18 years ago, 14-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | (...) Yah, I dislike these messages as well. Especially when there's no updated - but even when there are some, they should go to a statistics group, or some new group - but not in an actual discussion group. Just my $0.02. (18 years ago, 14-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006) —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | | | (...) lugnet.admin.database doesn't seem to be a discussion group. The charter says "Set listings, theme/set/element datafication & esoterica, etc." To me that sounds primarily like a data dumping ground, although I suppose discussion of that data (...) (18 years ago, 16-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006) —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | (...) Well, it's the best place I can think of for them, working from the assumption that lugnet.admin.database is the newsgroup for postings related to the LUGNET Guide. That assumption is not actually supported by the charter but no existing (...) (18 years ago, 16-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 14 Nov 2006) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) It does make it harder to see posts from people providing updated information. The log of updates is probably generally of minimal interest. Having it available is nice, but I don't need to see it on a daily basis. Of course, I've been a (...) (18 years ago, 16-Nov-06, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
