 | | New newsgroup for MOC announcements
|
|
A new group/list for personal announcements of "MOC"s ("my own creations") has just been created, the purpose being to focus these types of announcements and offload them out of the main lugnet.announce group, which was never intended for (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.nntp) !!
|
| |
| | Re: "MOC" Blacksmith Shop on lego.com
|
|
(...) Yep. And I would now too. As I mentioned, I think it just visually looked different to me when posting via the web interface. I'm really not that much of a netiot I was just having a newbie flashback moment I think. :) (...) This actually (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Perhaps you should spend more money on pots than Lego 8?) Unless it was some other kind of pot you're talking about 8?/ ROSCO FUT .o-t.fun (23 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: "MOC" Blacksmith Shop on lego.com
|
|
(...) I would. The quote marks indicate the stuff the quotee wrote. Think about the use of quotes in normal text, you write: Tom said: "Let's play." not "Tom said: Let's play". If you are quoting a passage from a book or something you do this: When (...) (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) yup, just counting X-Real-Life-Name headers. Dan (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:GpBx9D.CMy@lugnet.com... (...) yesterday... (...) Yikes!!! I never would have thought to get into the 200s let alone this. Cool. Gary (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Wow! I thought I'd have many more pots than this, but once I factor in the 4 months I was offline this number makes a bit more sense. Still....enough slacking off, I'm WAY behind Lar this year. ;) -Dave (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
AHHHH! I didn't know I posted THAT much! I'm 13th! Josh (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Does this include the nightly activity posts under Todd's name? Still, to be #3.... I'd better not let my boss see that... Frank (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) :p I've been good lately, very few low-content posts. I just put the puns in the useful postings... Steve (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:GpBx9D.CMy@lugnet.com... (...) yesterday... (...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) <snip> In a way this is kinda deceptive because I used Ken's name for a bit after he died untill I was able to get mine (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Rather Scary. 20 people post over a fifth of the messages here. :-o Scott A (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) It would be interesting to update last years list, so a comparision between now and last year can be made. -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) If I was a .cad I wouldn't want an analysis of it either. ;-) -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Ouch. I guess that's the result of keeping quiet and laying low for such a long time. So... Hi Frank, nice to meet'cha! I've been around for a pretty long time, though at present I'm going through a bit of a "dim age". Not dark, but not very (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) yesterday... (...) Thanks Dan! (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Todd's list last year was a list for all posts since September 1998, IIRC. I may be slacking, but there's no way I posted half as much this year as last. But I think you're right in that some of the "newness" has faded. As far as MOC's are (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Most likely it's due to the new posting verification rules. It's been discussed that overall posting is significantly down since the email verification kicked in. Adrian (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) 8th place!?!?! Oh holy cripes...Jill's gonna' kill me! I really had NO idea I posted here quite this often...I assume that this list isn't filtered for crossposts, right? So there's a CHANCE that I'm at least out of the top ten? GEEZ! Matt (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
|
|
(...) Hmmm ... last year we had 31 people with over a thousand posts, and this year only 9. Plus the overall number has gone down - any ideas what this is attributed to? The newness of Lugnet wearing off? I wonder if the hits are higher than last (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
