 | | Re: problems with innxmit —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) according to RFC 977: The IHAVE command informs the server that the client has an article whose id is <messageid>. If the server desires a copy of that article, it will return a response instructing the client to send the entire article. If (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: problems with innxmit —Ian Smith
|
| | | | (...) Yes, that's exactly what I'm trying to do. You see, I pay for phone calls, so I don't want to be dialled-up to the internet the whole time I'm meandering around lugnet reading messages. My machine runs a server, so it connects to the internet, (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: problems with innxmit —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) why not just work in SMTP then? subscribe to all the groups, set up procmail (if you have it) or other mail filters to drop the messages in the right folders, and reply via smtp... it'll be queued and you can flush the queue whenever you're (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: problems with innxmit —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | (...) The problem with this approach is that cancels are not honored. If a person posts a message, and then regrets and cancels it, it will still be posted to all the SMTP subscribers. A new, corrected version of the same article will then be (...) (23 years ago, 30-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| | | | |
