 | | Re: Web interface "quirk"?
|
|
(...) Has anyone else seen this behavior? Any comments? ++Lar (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial postings
|
|
(...) I think that's a great idea. (...) You *could* do that. but I think the message is more important than the package. What matters more to me is the signature rather than how it got posted... (...) I'm not sure I would do that. I think you need (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scenes at BrickDreams, and Thanks
|
|
(...) It's fine, but you might want to set the 'Followup-To:' header to point at lugnet.cad.ray if you expect the discussion to wander in that direction (like, let's say, in-depth discussion of the tools you used and things like that). Otherwise, (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Official vs. unofficial postings
|
|
(...) I've been giving this a lot of thought, and upon your recommendations, Larry, I've decided to change the way I post. I haven't decided on an official LUGNET admin sig yet, but for starters I'll definitely be making the 'From:' header be an (...) (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | REQ: New Group(s)---lugnet.off-topic.test Heirarchy
|
|
G'day Todd, I am requesting that some additional "test" groups be established to facilitate testing of cross-posts, follow-ups, trims, etc. While am I not having any particular technical problems with these techniques, there are some nuances of (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.design
|
|
(...) Hmm - actually I think lugnet.build.theory might be a better name, in keeping with .market.theory The idea being to have a group that talks about the design ideas in an abstract way without being full of MOC announcements & praise (which is (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.design
|
|
(...) OK, I'll bite... What is wrong with .build? Maybe you arn't going into the subgroups of build? There is .build.arch for architecture, and .build.mecha for Mecha etc.? Sorry but just suggesting a group without expaining Why it is a good idea (...) (24 years ago, 24-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.design
|
|
(...) Not a bad idea... but this should go in lugnet.admin.nntp I believe... However, as a hierarchicalist, I'd suggest lugnet.build.design instead. FUT: lugnet.admin.nntp (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle is not Technic
|
|
(...) Definitely not 8?( However that is only a feature of the web interface. Viewing news.lugnet.com/technic by default actually displays the technic group and all it's sub-groups. You can filter out all the sub-groups by clicking on the "View (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing the level of chatter in lugnet.lego.direct
|
|
(...) What browser was used? With Netscape at least, I regularly see it give up after a transaction is only partly done (I've never experienced this during a post, only during a read). The more I experience HTTP, the more I feel it's a broken (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
