To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 687
686  |  688
Subject: 
Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:59:01 GMT
Viewed: 
2046 times
  
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Mike Faunce writes:
"John Hansen" <JohnBinder@aol.com> wrote:

Content
totally trumps conveyance.

Really?

So you put just as much value in an article that is published in the
Ridgemont High Student Newspaper as the New York Times?  The National
Enquirer vs Time magazine?  The Daily Show vs ABC News?

Come on, the conveyance has at least some influence on the reception of the
content.

I think you're totally correct. In the general case, that is. Just not in
this case

In this case, if Jake, for example, posts something from a personal address
and says "this is the real deal" I am only infinitesimally less likely to
trust its veracity than if it was posted with his settings set to lego.com

Yes, there is the chance of spoofing, but it's there in either case.

I would say that if the intent is that "official pronouncements" should not
be made outside the lego hierarchy, that's what the rule should say. The
implementation mechanism of restricting where posts come from may not be the
best way to achieve this goal. But there may not be a better one available
that doesn't require moderating posts.

Note carefully that I have said nothing about whether the policy is a good
idea or not. We *had* that discussion, it's over.

This merely comments on whether the current mechanism achieves the policy.
I previously sugggested (while somewhat spun up) that the LEGO folk just
leave their settings set to personal all the time, and add some text at the
bottom when they wanted to make "official pronouncements".

On reflection, while that stays within the technical limitations in place, I
think it violates the spirit of what Todd intended.

I'm not sure, though, and would welcome clarification of intent from Todd.

++Lar



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
 
"John Hansen" <JohnBinder@aol.com> wrote in message news:GAIqxs.73o@lugnet.com... (...) content (...) official (...) Content (...) Really? So you put just as much value in an article that is published in the Ridgemont High Student Newspaper as the (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR