| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Frank Filz writes:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> > This is important, yes, and we should talk about options that best enable
> > dissemination by LEGO of such information. I would not be opposed to
> > deleting the lugnet.announce.lsahs group and moving its content to
> > lugnet.lego.announce or some new group, say, lugnet.lego.shop.announce,
> > and combine things a bit.
>
> I'd recommend lugnet.lego.shop.announce (or just lugnet.lego.shop -
> though that might invite discussion about LEGO shopping avenues.
>
> Hmm, I just had an idea. Set one or more lugnet.lego.xyz.announce
> groups, which only TLC can post to. Then have a sister lugnet.lego.xyz
> group where anyone can post. To make it a little easier on the TLC
> employees, automatically cross-post lugnet.lego.xyz.announce postings to
> lugnet.lego.xyz, and set follow-ups there.
I like the format of lugnet.lego.foo only for official postings, with automagic
duplication into lugnet.lego.foo.d (iscussion) because I think it is more clear
than anything else would be. But then you have a .lego.* group that we're al
posting to and I don't know if that's what you/we want. I'm not sure that I
have the big picture of how these posting privs are working yet, but I do think
it's important to foster dialog between us and TLC, not just give them a way to
announce stuff.
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
