To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 550
549  |  551
Subject: 
Re: New Group Proposal - LUGNET.LEGO.QA
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Sat, 17 Mar 2001 00:47:02 GMT
Viewed: 
2591 times
  
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Eric Kingsley writes:
> Well it may have been intended that way at the begining but it definitely >isn't
> that right now.  I think if Todd implements the restrictions he mentioned >here:
> 
> http://news.lugnet.com/admin/nntp/?n=317
> 
> then there may not be a need for the group.  Right now though .lego.direct
> seems to get confused by some people as .dear-lego.  It also seems to be a
> place where people go to rant on occasion.
> 
> I just thought a place where there were heavy restrictions on who could post
> and when along with making it a "one-stop-shopping" place for Q & A which is >no
> longer possible in the themed groups.
> 
> Like I said I wanted this to be more of a brainstorming thread where we could
> think of ways to improve 2 way communication while keeping the restrictions
> Todd put in place in effect.
> 
> I personally love the fact that all offical LEGO posts will be made in
> lugnet.lego.*  This makes it much easier for me to find these posts and
> understand where the person (LEGO employee) is coming from without having to
> try and figure out if it was a fan post or an offical "LEGO Position" post.
> 
> 
> 
> Eric Kingsley

I agree Eric. Recently I put a post about the lack of Blue 1 x 6 and 1 x 8
bricks available from Bulk sales at S@H, and some AFOL took the opportunity
to promote his Brickbay page. I just hope that LEGO realizes I cannot order
from this flogging American because I live in Canada and he ships US only. :-)

I posted to .lego.direct to get a reply from LEGO not someone else.

Jude



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Group Proposal - LUGNET.LEGO.QA
 
(...) Well it may have been intended that way at the begining but it definitely isn't that right now. I think if Todd implements the restrictions he mentioned here: (URL) there may not be a need for the group. Right now though .lego.direct seems to (...) (26 years ago, 17-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR