To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 466
465  |  467
Subject: 
Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp
Date: 
Fri, 16 Mar 2001 15:15:13 GMT
Viewed: 
2241 times
  
In lugnet.admin.nntp, John Hansen writes:
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman writes:

Money.  They're a business.  Don't ever forget it.

Todd, you make it sound as if you think that is evil.

On the surface, yes, it sounds that way.  But I doubt he meant it that way.

For whatever reason, some people here need to be constantly reminded that not
everyone who works for LEGO is a LEGO fan.  They aren't all bringing home
bricks every night and building things.  They aren't here participating out of
the goodness of their hearts.  Everything that LEGO does has one purpose:  to
increase their revenue.  They are here as part of a marketing strategy.

Now, we might think it's a good marketing strategy- even a *cool* marketing
strategy (a rare thing indeed!)- after all, LEGO has lately been giving us
things we've wanted for a long time- but it's important not to lose sight of
the fact that it is, in fact, a marketing strategy.

And a marketing strategy is very different than fans interacting.

If these posts harmed anyone, please explain the manner in which they harmed
you.

They haven't harmed anyone specific as far as I know, but they do water down
the purpose of Lugnet.  This has been said before, so try to take it to heart
this time:  Lugnet is a website "by fans, for fans".  LEGO employees are not
automatically LEGO fans.

This move doesn't tell LEGO to leave Lugnet completely.  It asks them to
restrict their activities to a certain portion of the server.  They can still
post *any* information they want to there.  So, I ask you:  How does this move
harm "anyone", or the community?

eric



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) Examples have been given. That you choose to ignore them is your choice but doesn't change what reality actually is. Switching identities is a PITA. Try it. So the net effect of this new rule is that when an answer to a question asked in a (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
  Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) So, Can we all take a look at the study you have done on all lego employees? I have yet to see any examples of how they clutter, dilute or otherwise do anything negative in any way. Jake is a fan, if I am not mistaken he is a member of Lugnet. (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Relationship - LEGO and its Fans (was: Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings)
 
(...) Todd, you make it sound as if you think that is evil. "Never forget they're after your money." You are after our money too. You aren't evil. Maybe they want us to play with and enjoy owning Lego bricks. Would you prefer they were a non-profit (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR