 | | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings —Mark Papenfuss
| | | | First, I want to say I may regret replying to this post, I see everybody has left it alone so far - its kinda scary being the one breaking the ice, lol. In lugnet.lego.direct, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> (...) I personally do not think they would (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings —Todd Lehman
| | | | | | (...) (URL) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings —Mark Papenfuss
| | | | | | | (...) Wow, after a long day of reading and writing papers for school - that one made my head spin, lol - let me see if i understood it correctly: We can post there, but we can not repspond to another one of our posts? And, As long as there is a lego (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings —Dan Jezek
| | | | | (...) This is a little ironic. For years the community tried to get TLC involved and to participate and now it's trying to keep them out. There has to be a reason for this which we (the end-users of Lugnet) will most likely never know. I sort of (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | | |
