| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Frank Filz writes:
> Lorbaat wrote:
> > I think this whole move is a Good Thing (tm). Combined with the changes
> > Todd
> > was talking about concerning who could post/follow-up to the lugnet.lego.*
> > groups, I think it would be an Even Better Thing (tm).
>
> Is it really a good thing if someone at TLC happens to have TLC records
> which allow them to answer one of the "Dear Gary" posts, and they are
> allowed to share that information, to not allow them to directly respond
> to the original question?
They can answer the question. They just can't answer it in a fan forum. Which
*is* a good thing, because when you see it there will be no doubt that it is
100% Official LEGO position.
> Are we saying that we ONLY want to see fan
> speculation?
No, I am saying that I would prefer to see fans only in the fan areas.
> Or are people not seeing a problem since with the web interface, a
> response is easily tied to the original post, no matter what group the
> response lands in?
I'm not seeing a problem because even in NNTP readers I can be subscribed to
lugnet.lego.* if I want to see official LEGO posts.
> Interestingly, TLC employees aren't even allowed to post in the .admin
> groups, so if they have a question about posting, they have to ask over
> in lugnet.lego.direct or whatever.
Or they can email the admins.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
