Subject:
|
Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 21:30:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1618 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, William R. Ward writes:
> Todd, I think it was probably a bad idea to institute this policy
> without discussing it with the LEGO folks who post regularly. It
> sounds like Jake at least was taken quite by surprise by it.
>
> --Bill.
Todd,
Are these Lego individuals members of LUGNET? (I know Jake is) And if so have
you provided them with an alternate means of posting? (such as a different
e-mail address through the web interface or from home)
As long as you do not revoke any of their membership priviledges (or else that
would not be fair), I think you can do with them as you see fit. (And I agree
with this policy)
Jude
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) I haven't looked. The member listings are here if you're curious: (URL) (I know Jake is) And if so have (...) If a LEGO Company employee is also an AFOL, yes, they certainly _can_ post in an unofficial capacity (i.e., as an AFOL on their own (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Official vs. unofficial LEGO postings
|
| (...) Can you elaborate on what you mean by "sanctity"? I'm sensing that there's some problem here that you're more aware of than some of us. It may be that it's too sensitive to go into, so that's fine if that's the case. But my perception was that (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
232 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
